
PROGRESSIVE REVENUE
Washington state has the second most regressive tax system in the nation, behind only Florida: the lowest-income households pay state and local taxes at a rate more than three times higher than the wealthiest. We’re “a tax haven like the Cayman Islands,” in the words of University of Washington economist Jake Vigdor. Progressive taxes — like the JumpStart payroll expense tax, which I played a key role in designing and passing — help to shift our tax system in a more just and balanced direction by raising revenue from the wealthiest households and corporations.
The need for public investment depends on the scale of the problems the government is called upon to solve. The rapid growth of Seattle’s tech sector and population, without an expansion of housing supply to match, has caused an escalating housing affordability and homelessness crisis. This ongoing emergency, combined with untreated drug use and mental illness, has driven a growing mismatch between resources and need. Even before the pandemic, Seattle was headed toward a structural budget deficit.
Now, a perfect storm of factors is making our revenue problem worse: Pandemic-era inflation. Economic uncertainty due to Trump’s tariffs. This April’s revenue forecast predicted that the City will bring in $240 million less during the 2025-26 biennium than was assumed in the adopted budget — and that’s not accounting for likely cuts to federal funding that flows through Seattle.
The City needs to be smart about using our existing budget efficiently and effectively, but we must also raise new progressive revenue to continue to deliver the services residents depend on, from libraries and parks to shelter and emergency response.
I served on the Seattle Revenue Stabilization Workgroup in 2023 and did extensive research into our progressive revenue options. Unfortunately, Harrell’s administration shelved that work and we’re now on the back foot as the City faces these mounting crises.